On mySimon: Christian Louboutin Very Prive Pumps
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
Look again!
Where is quicktime?

I followed your link yesterday and came to:
TA06-011A Apple QuickTime Vulnerabilities January 11, 2006
TA06-010A Microsoft Windows, Outlook, and Exchange Vulnerabilities January 10, 2006
TA06-005A Update for Microsoft Windows Metafile Vulnerability January 5, 2006

The listing in cyber-security alert says it is explotable. that is why it exists.

You have changed your tune. Originally you said that the items on the list were for exploits that came out before patches.
These alerts are listed because an exploit is already in the wild.

I asked a simple answer: show me the exploit and instead of showing me the exploits already in the wild you now reply with: uh, I meant that the vulnerability is exploitable, yeah, that's it!
Okay, now that we've established that your last 5 posts have been complete lies, let me ask you 2 related questions:
1. What kind of vulnerability isn't exploitable? If you can't do anything bad with a vulnerability, is it a vulnerability?
2. Why fix unexploitable vulnerabilities? Maybe rephrase slightly: Why put anything but a low priority on fixing unexploitable vulnerabilities?
Posted by: NonZealot   Posted on: 01/12/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Updates installed!  Grayson Peddie | 01/10/06
Zealot logic dictates that these aren't serious  NonZealot | 01/10/06
better tell CERT that, they think it is critical  ~doolittle~ | 01/10/06
This proves that Windows is more secure!!1!!!one!!1  NonZealot | 01/11/06
CERT cyber security alert is where you don't want your listing  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
Post-exploit patches? Show me the exploits!  NonZealot | 01/11/06
you just answered your own question  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
No, I didn't  NonZealot | 01/11/06
RE: No, I didn't (inverse proprotions explained)  ~doolittle~ | 01/12/06
Hey Doolittle, only one, very simple question  NonZealot | 01/12/06
RE: Hey... I don't have to show anything - CERT says so  ~doolittle~ | 01/12/06
Look again!  NonZealot | 01/12/06
Flaw Could Allow Hacker To 'Own Every Outlook User In The World In A Week'  ~doolittle~ | 01/12/06
"An exploit exists"  toadlife | 01/13/06
Again  Shelendrea | 01/10/06
Ouch!  toadlife | 01/10/06
All it takes is one user to make a mistake  crocd | 01/10/06
Our users don't have...  toadlife | 01/10/06
need a  Shelendrea | 01/10/06
Why not...  SGT_Spam | 01/10/06
Various reasons  toadlife | 01/10/06
I agree with that  crocd | 01/11/06
Read Proof of concept  voska | 01/11/06
link?  toadlife | 01/11/06
Windows takes the lead in CERT Technical Cyber Security Alerts '06  ~doolittle~ | 01/10/06
This proves that Windows is more secure!!1!!!one!1  NonZealot | 01/11/06
the listing shoud be in the summary - not the high-risk listing  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
...nice try, you just keep shooting yourself in the foot (nt)  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
Why Windows will never be secure  Chad_z | 01/11/06
And if Linux had 95% of the desktop...  3D0G | 01/11/06
Blasphemy!  toadlife | 01/11/06
FLAME ON!  Shelendrea | 01/11/06
Obscure OS's are good for people like you that don't understand security  toadlife | 01/11/06
Calling "Bytemaster"..  jinko | 01/11/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement