On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
CERT cyber security alert is where you don't want your listing
These alerts are listed because an exploit is already in the wild.

So how is that good? it is post-exploit.

Let me quote myself...
"BEFORE they are a serious security risk"

this means listed as a fixed patch pre-exploit. Post-exploit is not good...
Posted by: ~doolittle~   Posted on: 01/11/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Updates installed!  Grayson Peddie | 01/10/06
Zealot logic dictates that these aren't serious  NonZealot | 01/10/06
better tell CERT that, they think it is critical  ~doolittle~ | 01/10/06
This proves that Windows is more secure!!1!!!one!!1  NonZealot | 01/11/06
CERT cyber security alert is where you don't want your listing  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
Post-exploit patches? Show me the exploits!  NonZealot | 01/11/06
you just answered your own question  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
No, I didn't  NonZealot | 01/11/06
RE: No, I didn't (inverse proprotions explained)  ~doolittle~ | 01/12/06
Hey Doolittle, only one, very simple question  NonZealot | 01/12/06
RE: Hey... I don't have to show anything - CERT says so  ~doolittle~ | 01/12/06
Look again!  NonZealot | 01/12/06
Flaw Could Allow Hacker To 'Own Every Outlook User In The World In A Week'  ~doolittle~ | 01/12/06
"An exploit exists"  toadlife | 01/13/06
Again  Shelendrea | 01/10/06
Ouch!  toadlife | 01/10/06
All it takes is one user to make a mistake  crocd | 01/10/06
Our users don't have...  toadlife | 01/10/06
need a  Shelendrea | 01/10/06
Why not...  SGT_Spam | 01/10/06
Various reasons  toadlife | 01/10/06
I agree with that  crocd | 01/11/06
Read Proof of concept  voska | 01/11/06
link?  toadlife | 01/11/06
Windows takes the lead in CERT Technical Cyber Security Alerts '06  ~doolittle~ | 01/10/06
This proves that Windows is more secure!!1!!!one!1  NonZealot | 01/11/06
the listing shoud be in the summary - not the high-risk listing  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
...nice try, you just keep shooting yourself in the foot (nt)  ~doolittle~ | 01/11/06
Why Windows will never be secure  Chad_z | 01/11/06
And if Linux had 95% of the desktop...  3D0G | 01/11/06
Blasphemy!  toadlife | 01/11/06
FLAME ON!  Shelendrea | 01/11/06
Obscure OS's are good for people like you that don't understand security  toadlife | 01/11/06
Calling "Bytemaster"..  jinko | 01/11/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here