Hey,,,what is it with Microsoft !?!?!?!?
I'm Ye, the MS SHILL . | 12/08/05
|

They're working on the "Fix"
Rick_K | 12/08/05
|
 
We could just switch to a tiger
Boot_Agnostic | 12/08/05
|
  
I'm stoked for Bobcat
Jeff Spicoli | 12/09/05
|
   
No, Ocelot.
Haterock Davidsfather | 12/11/05
|
 
I don't have to pay for Vista.
Haterock Davidsfather | 12/11/05
|

The short answer is never
Real World | 12/09/05
|
No fair!
yyuko@... | 12/08/05
|

Maybe because...
rapson | 12/08/05
|
 
Invulnerable?
nucrash | 12/08/05
|
  
He's right
Real World | 12/09/05
|
   
So what?
Haterock Davidsfather | 12/11/05
|

Be fair!
fizzmaster | 12/08/05
|

The Irony is I don't check the front page
nucrash | 12/09/05
|
Fixes coming for Windows flaws
Loverock Davidson | 12/08/05
|

It's only prevention if the exploit is not already available.
Zogg | 12/08/05
|
Windows can't be fixed ...
Reverend MacFellow | 12/08/05
|

Get er done!
Boot_Agnostic | 12/08/05
|

then we would only need to apply Apple's patches
mdemuth | 12/08/05
|
 
Oh, I don't know about that...
woot! | 12/09/05
|
  
Not enough of em'
toadlife | 12/09/05
|
   
I agree
Boot_Agnostic | 12/09/05
|
   
Please explain this.
Haterock Davidsfather | 12/11/05
|
    
it's just more hedging, apologizing, excusing
Jeff Spicoli | 12/11/05
|
 
Sure it's more intuitive.
Haterock Davidsfather | 12/11/05
|
Not quite correct
steve.peck@... | 12/08/05
|

Wouldn't exploits requiring user action NOT be deemed "critical"?
Zogg | 12/08/05
|
FireFox 1.5
nhiep_nguyen@... | 12/09/05
|

Out of context?
balsover | 12/09/05
|