On The Insider: Elizabeth Taylor to Open Jewelry Store
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 59:
Next »
« Previous
Posting attempt 2 : Dangerous to Microsoft credibility
Wasn't a list of un-patched Windows flaws published on ZDnet very recently? Oh yes, it was.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/index.php?p=135


Here is a list of unpatched Windows XP issues. Are they dangerous! Ha! Do bees hum? Do MS trolls try to pretend there's "nothing to see here"? Is every single Microsoft Windows user at risk from exploits aimed at any one of these un-patched flaws? Yes! Could any one of the MS fan boys trying despeartely to direct attention away from this issue, be posting from an infected Windows machine? Yes! UNPATCHED.

That means every Windows box on the planet is a candidate for infection by an exploit for any one of these flaws. And guess what? The hackers won't issue a public advisary when they've released the explouit into the wild. The first you'll know of it is reading an MS troll posting "oooooh this isn't dangerous, honest!"

As per ususal, users of non-Microsoft operating systems are un-affected.


Microsoft Windows UPnP GetDeviceList Denial of Service
Microsoft Windows XP Wireless Zero Configuration Wireless Profile Disclosure (Microsoft promises a fix for Windows Vista, but what about Windows XP SP2? That's still the most up to date environment the last time I checked.)
Windows Registry Editor Utility String Concealment Weakness
Microsoft Windows Unspecified USB Device Driver Vulnerability
Windows Remote Desktop Protocol Private Key Disclosure
Microsoft Windows Image Rendering Denial of Service Vulnerability
Microsoft Jet Database Engine Database File Parsing Vulnerability
Windows Registry Key Locking Denial of Service
Windows XP Internet Connection Firewall Bypass Weakness
Windows Packet Fragmentation Handling Denial of Service Vulnerability
Microsoft Java Virtual Machine Cross-Site Communication Vulnerability
Microsoft Windows "desktop.ini" Arbitrary File Execution Vulnerability
Windows Metafile Handling Vulnerability
Windows XP Malicious Folder Automatic Code Execution Vulnerability
Microsoft HTML Help Control Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Windows RPC Race Condition Denial of Service Vulnerability
Microsoft Windows Unauthorised Thread Termination
Microsoft Windows TCP Packet Information Disclosure
Windows NTFS File System Information Disclosure
XP PostMessage Password Disclosure
Microsoft Windows Terminal Server Denial of service
Microsoft Windows crashes on invalid font file
Microsoft Windows Certificate Chain vulnerability
Windows XP expose registered wireless access points
Windows XP admin downgrade problem
NT will let user execute any 16bit application
XP Remote Desktop DoS
Posted by: whisperycat   Posted on: 12/05/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Ho Humm  toadlife | 12/02/05
This isn't dangerous at all!!  NonZealot | 12/02/05
There IS an exploit  wackoae | 12/02/05
yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 12/02/05
Be carefull Jeff  toadlife | 12/02/05
Using one's own argument against them...  jasonp@... | 12/02/05
I agree...  toadlife | 12/02/05
thankie  Jeff Spicoli | 12/02/05
I don't believe in that nonsense  Jeff Spicoli | 12/02/05
ok  toadlife | 12/02/05
Matter of conception  georgep_z | 12/03/05
I am aware of what you just said, but...  toadlife | 12/03/05
Shame on you toadie...  jasonp@... | 12/03/05
Shame on you toadie...  jasonp@... | 12/03/05
Yet another person that completely misses the point  toadlife | 12/03/05
Matter of conception  georgep_z | 12/03/05
because......  NemesisNL | 12/04/05
one thing funny to mention...  linuxoverwindows | 12/06/05
one thing funny to mention...  linuxoverwindows | 12/06/05
?  linuxoverwindows | 12/06/05
Dangerous to Microsoft credibility  whisperycat | 12/05/05
Posting attempt 2 : Dangerous to Microsoft credibility  whisperycat | 12/05/05
glad to know it isnt just me...  linuxoverwindows | 12/06/05
This isn't dangerous at all!!  NonZealot | 12/02/05
keep it in your pants  Jeff Spicoli | 12/02/05
I think you responded to a double post.  osreinstall | 12/03/05
I realized it  Jeff Spicoli | 12/03/05
voice of officer barbarady  linuxoverwindows | 12/06/05
I thought he was being sarcastic???  zdn@... | 12/05/05
How long?  broper | 12/02/05
Here we go again ,,,,,  I'm Ye, the MS SHILL . | 12/02/05
This is true.  Cardinal_Bill | 12/02/05
Message has been deleted.  Cardinal_Bill | 12/02/05
re: How long?  hk165 | 12/03/05
If they are silly enough  jackie40d@... | 12/03/05
IE again hahaha  jackie40d@... | 12/03/05
Oh really?  Haterock Davidsfather | 12/03/05
Nope  NemesisNL | 12/04/05
Interesting.  Haterock Davidsfather | 12/04/05
PS.  Haterock Davidsfather | 12/04/05
No move to Linux yet  mikeybrass | 12/03/05
No move to Linux yet  mikeybrass | 12/03/05
Have you notified them yet?  Cardinal_Bill | 12/03/05
Thing is  mikeybrass | 12/04/05
You like using a browser without JavaScript?  Haterock Davidsfather | 12/04/05
What are you on about?  mikeybrass | 12/05/05
Java is NOT JavaScript  mtifo@... | 12/05/05
And your point is what...  mikeybrass | 12/05/05
What are you on about?  mikeybrass | 12/05/05
Use FIREFOX and be done with it!  IT-sys | 12/03/05
And they are moving into your neighborhood  Boot_Agnostic | 12/04/05
Use FIREFOX and be done with it!  IT-sys | 12/03/05
Their Answer  ipfresh@... | 12/04/05
Message has been deleted.  nix_os_fan | 12/04/05
Another IE security flaw  jackofalltradesmasterofnone | 12/04/05
IE flaw lets intruders into Google Desktop  jackofalltradesmasterofnone | 12/04/05
IE flaws are not news  Chad_z | 12/05/05
Will only move when  mikeybrass | 12/05/05
A flaw in IE ???  realitycheck101 | 12/05/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here