On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 20:
Next »
« Previous
Bye bye, SPF! Plus: alternatives...
SPF was a nice alternative but I'm disappointed that they sold it at all (especially to the company that they did). What a nice way to thank those who did buy it. Oh well, maybe they'll survive long enough for people to forget ? and maybe not. Meanwhile, I nabbed the last SPF version before they sold it.

I've nothing against ZoneAlarm, except the incessant ZAP nagging upon EVERY reboot that I experienced when its subscription expired. When I called their tech support and asked how to stop the nagging until I was ready to up my subscription I was advised to uninstall it. Heh! So I did, and in a rage I zapped the unopened box that I'd purchased for another computer too! I hope I've sufficiently uninstalled it now. ZA is ok, but I don't recommend it or ZAP to my customers anymore.

Maybe Outpost Firewall? And they have a free version that's just a little stripped down. The free version of SPF was a little stripped down, too.

On the other hand ? there is this somewhat intimidating but super powerful free solution:
http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ipf-howto.txt
It's not Windows based, but the very interesting thing is that it is possible to use it to make a box with IPF that is "IP-less" (it has no IP address and is completely transparent to network traffic and uses 2 NIC's). See section 9.2 at the above link. The box can sit between the modem and the router (yes, you read that correct, on the WAN side of the router!) and do firewalling that keeps the cpu usage way down on all the downstream (LAN side of the router) computer firewalls. I built one, using FreeBSD, and it's a really cool stand alone "first line defense" firewall.
Posted by: Tech Maven   Posted on: 12/02/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

This is a sad day  too_much green_tea | 11/28/05
RE: This is a sad day  wackoae | 11/28/05
I always have a copy  skeptic tank | 11/29/05
Yes, Sad Day Indeed  markdoiron | 11/29/05
The wheels are turning  node357 | 11/28/05
No, they aren't.  A_Pickle | 11/28/05
Symantec SUCKS to Begin with  RonsMail4U@... | 11/29/05
Wait.... so...  A_Pickle | 11/29/05
Symantec SUCKS to Begin with  RonsMail4U@... | 11/29/05
Symantec=  zmud | 11/29/05
are consumers idiots?  rastaub | 11/29/05
Consumers are definitely questionable.  zindorf1 | 11/29/05
Well, yeah....  T38 | 11/29/05
l33t haxor  alternaloser | 11/30/05
That's ONE way to ICE the Competition...  btljooz | 11/30/05
Bye bye, SPF! Plus: alternatives...  Tech Maven | 12/02/05
Symantec screws Sygate customers  ndalehurt | 12/05/05
Norton Alerts Pull 30in. of Vacuum  toastmaster | 12/10/05
SYGATE  alwyn@... | 05/02/06
Symantec... BRING IT BACK!  amres | 07/12/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More