On mySimon: Luke Skywalker Doll
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 136:
Next »
« Previous
Points
1) The admin/root isssue is the most valid point, but the average home user would still need to have root-level access to install/etc. on their machine. Proper security in Windows would slow them down (and that's a good start), but dumb users will still be dumb enough to type in the admin password or whatever. Finding a way to get proper security to the 6-8 year-old systems that were written when these things weren't an issue, that's another challenge.

2) Don't tell me you bought into that MS lie -- the browser is NOT "deeply" tied into the OS. It's in there more than it should be, perhaps, but "deeply" -- come on. This is also not the issue that spread this trojan.

3) Media Player has some hooks, but Outlook? Again, come on. It's not integrated at all. It might be possible to be more secure (or less) if it was. And again, these are not the issues that caused this thing to spread, and you also left out the main culprit - the user's ZIP program.

4a) Supressing file extensions - agreed, it's not a great idea, but seeing them still only goes to protecting those who understand them; many would still open naked_photo.bmp.exe, either because they simply didn't even bother to check or because they don't know what it means. It would be another good start, though.

4b) ActiveX, in general, and in the browser specifically has issues in its current implementation. No arguments there. But this wasn't what caused this trojan to spread.

4c) Neither VBScript nor integrating apps is a bad idea. The current implemenation is lacking somewhat in security and needs fixing, but integrating apps and a means to do so is generally a GOOD thing. And, yet again, this wasn't the thing that caused this trojan to spread.

This is, first and foremost, an issue with USERS and their behaviors.
Posted by: pschroeder@...   Posted on: 02/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

No, it shows Microsoft software is not working!!!  Bobby Sskcat | 02/03/04
You need a life....  DarbyOhara | 02/03/04
Flaming does not prove your point  Michael Kelly | 02/03/04
I'll give it a shot.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/03/04
Excellent suggestion  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
So why hasn't MS done this?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/04/04
Good question  pschroeder@... | 02/04/04
Why wait 4 to 6 years?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/04/04
waiting  pschroeder@... | 02/05/04
partly agree  ryusen | 02/03/04
Ask And Ye Shall Receive ...  coffeenite | 02/03/04
Please do go on  Michael Kelly | 02/03/04
Points  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
More Points  coffeenite | 02/03/04
Deep browsers and ZIP programs  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
Browsers, operating systems, and untrusted techies  Anton Philidor | 02/03/04
No, it proves that there is always a bigger idiot  nucrash | 02/03/04
Users aren't always that dumb ...  coffeenite | 02/03/04
...but, quite often, they are!  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
Eh ....  coffeenite | 02/03/04
What to do?  Doug@... | 02/03/04
Do this  MarcB_z | 02/03/04
Sigh  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
Get rid of ActiveX and VBA and 97% of the problem is solved  MarcB_z | 02/04/04
Neither of which would have solved THIS problem (NT)  pschroeder@... | 02/04/04
But that other 3% thingy would have (NT)  MarcB_z | 02/05/04
maybe ... except for the dumb user issue (NT)  pschroeder@... | 02/05/04
Fine for the corporate environment  jfrankcarr | 02/03/04
question  Hanover Phist | 02/03/04
...which...  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
you are right  ryusen | 02/03/04
Save and execute no fix  wolf_z | 02/03/04
AMEN, Built-in SECURITY helps tho'  MarcB_z | 02/03/04
Ok, so then they should have rights to restrict what you can do on your pc?  TreborG2 | 02/03/04
I think they should be restricted  voska | 02/03/04
restrictions  ryusen | 02/03/04
Nobody said "restrict"  MarcB_z | 02/04/04
Restrict execs  Domb2 | 02/03/04
don't forget...  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
Harder to hurt yourself/easier to effect others  Domb2 | 02/03/04
integration  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
RE Integration  Domb2 | 02/03/04
RE RE integration  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
re re re:  ryusen | 02/03/04
Integrated NOT EQUAL TO welded  MarcB_z | 02/04/04
Exactly.  bhanes@... | 02/03/04
Maybe we could return to non-executable mail?  Atlant | 02/03/04
Easy, get rid of VB & Office Macros  MarcB_z | 02/03/04
Lot's of systems use this technology  Heatlesssun | 02/03/04
Excel and Word are good reporting tools  jfrankcarr | 02/03/04
getting rid of useful features,  ryusen | 02/03/04
Microsft "solution" negates "useful" features  MarcB_z | 02/04/04
you don't get it... JPG & GIF can have embedded URLs!  TreborG2 | 02/03/04
Stupid Human Tricks  Squawkbox | 02/03/04
Actually ... Image files don't work that way  coffeenite | 02/03/04
Email should be just plain text  voska | 02/03/04
Files  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
Even at that  bhanes@... | 02/03/04
Of all things...  rbethell | 02/03/04
spam filtering doesn't stop mail from *known* sources  TreborG2 | 02/03/04
{cough} change the OS {cough}  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/03/04
still the wrong answer  TreborG2 | 02/03/04
good comments  Domb2 | 02/03/04
How about  bhanes@... | 02/03/04
The answer is so simple...  Heatlesssun | 02/03/04
Simpler solution  tic swayback | 02/03/04
to scan the attachment  Fred Flintsone | 02/03/04
Yes, I read it !  chawly | 02/09/04
funny thing about linux...  ryusen | 02/03/04
Suggested Solutions  Domb2 | 02/03/04
Other options  Letophoro | 02/03/04
And item 5  Domb2 | 02/03/04
Pop-up msg's worthless  Gasman_z | 02/03/04
Overrides are too common  Domb2 | 02/03/04
Let's agree and disagree  chawly | 02/09/04
The real story  usapride | 02/03/04
About enough  MkIIISupra | 02/03/04
license requirement  Domb2 | 02/03/04
Amen ... but apply that across the boards  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
Nice post.....  Jose Jimenez | 02/03/04
problem with licencing  ryusen | 02/03/04
The NSA are fools?  B.O.F.H. | 02/03/04
well  bhanes@... | 02/03/04
Yes but .....  chawly | 02/09/04
Granted I only deal with SMB's  JoeMama_z | 02/03/04
It won't work  j.m.galvin | 02/03/04
I have one big problem with your statement  JoeMama_z | 02/03/04
ZIP files  pschroeder@... | 02/04/04
in my origional post....  JoeMama_z | 02/04/04
antivirus  pschroeder@... | 02/04/04
Unless your anti virus updates every day.  JoeMama_z | 02/05/04
Daily updates  pschroeder@... | 02/05/04
P.L.B.A.C. Virus  JoeMama_z | 02/05/04
So what was that MyDoom thingy  FilledOut | 02/03/04
What it was  tic swayback | 02/03/04
Sorry  FilledOut | 02/03/04
Hey Kids  Fred Flintsone | 02/03/04
It Shows that Microsoft Has Near-Zero Security  brenthawkinsmd | 02/03/04
What mail software has built in Virus protection?  PeteS_z | 02/03/04
some do not  JWatson77 | 02/06/04
Corporate vs. Home users  jfrankcarr | 02/03/04
What a sad state of affairs.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/03/04
Actually the Internet was a DoD/DARPA project...  B.O.F.H. | 02/03/04
It started well before that.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/03/04
History lesson  B.O.F.H. | 02/03/04
Interesting turn of events  tic swayback | 02/03/04
Just hilarious  nograin | 02/03/04
SpongeWare  pj-xmesh | 02/03/04
We'll let you answer the phone  jfrankcarr | 02/03/04
Stop it! You can't use common sense here!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/03/04
well...  yucantrak | 02/03/04
True  JWatson77 | 02/06/04
Short coming in MS products  grumpy_trumpy | 02/03/04
Short coming in Victoria Secrets products  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/03/04
Linux - a Burka for your computer?  jfrankcarr | 02/03/04
You still don't "get it" do you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/03/04
Well, to use another analogy  jfrankcarr | 02/03/04
Congratulations - you get it  Harry Bardal | 02/03/04
Product Flaws  tic swayback | 02/03/04
The point is, blaming the victim.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/03/04
Should the user shoulder any responsibility?  tic swayback | 02/03/04
But...  quietLee | 02/04/04
I agree  JWatson77 | 02/06/04
How's that again?  pschroeder@... | 02/03/04
No Spam from Zombie attackers  ratatat62 | 02/03/04
Education of the END USER is the only solution  morgaine2003 | 02/04/04
Why Email Executables?  dadon | 02/04/04
Business reasons  pschroeder@... | 02/04/04
Why Email Executables?  dadon | 02/05/04
FTP  pschroeder@... | 02/05/04
Fighting Fire With Fire  LAMski | 02/08/04
Fix Email, not OS  DGSteig | 02/09/04
Wrong solution! Wrong target! Wrong thinking!  harperwill@... | 02/09/04
problem is between keyboard and chair...  absentia | 02/09/04
my Doom  a8a09923@... | 02/09/04
Oh well, sh** happens ...  Shodan_z | 02/13/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here