- TalkBack 19 of 42:
- Next »
- « Previous
- Thread View
- Flat View
- Even more so
-
since the MS platform has the non-technical users mostly in mind, it should pre-configure the system with the highest security settings and spend money to aggresively campaign safe PC practices.
However, it is not only the security settings that make this platform so vulnerable: there are long standing design issues in the core of the system (eg. RPC subsystem) and the fact that application code now runs inside the kernel. Let alone that a common user is an administrator and code running on his behalf can rewrite any setting, system files and DLLs.
Even after so many embarrasing worm/virus outbreaks with culprit the MS windows and public exorcims of insecurity, MS STILL HAS NO DECENT WAY DEALING with the mess. They allowed to grow out of control in the first place.
In the Unix/Linux/MVS/VMS, etc world, a decently configured system cannot be compromised nor does it allow a user to compromise other systems. Why all these 'old' systems are so much better in terms of security but the so recent ms windows is not?
MS has NO interest in fixing their s/w any time soon:
1 - the sloppy code techniques has shortened the time to market. Since people don't react to the pre-beta code that are purhasing, why should MS care?
2 - the lack of comprehensive security justifies a continuous stream of 'better' and better systems. This is old MS tactic: it always promisses and conditions the consumer about s/w that does not even exist, then the s/w comes out late and it is usually nothing really different from the previous s/w version (minus cosmetic changes).
"Our next OS x will cure all security and deficiency issues", FOR x in { win NT 3.51, 4.0, win2k, winXP, longhorn, shorttale, ..... };
The blame is for the user who does NOT learn even after repeated broken PR promisses.
Bigger blame are with all the 'specialists' who go MS no matter what.
-m - Posted by: michael-t Posted on: 01/30/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
What do you think?
SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads
- The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
- Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
- VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
- The best support in the Linux business
-
If Linux is going to power your mission-critical applications, you'd better have the best support known to business. Novell was rated the top provider of Linux technical support.

- Learn more >>
- The best support in the Linux business
-
If Linux is going to power your mission-critical applications, you'd better have the best support known to business. Novell was rated the top provider of Linux technical support.

- Learn more >>
- Reduce risk. Reduce complexity. Increase reliability.
-
A simplified IT environment isn't just less complex. It's also more reliable. Standardize on a single Linux platform with SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, and get the world's most interoperable Linux

- Learn more >>
- Learn more about tools to grow your business
-
The Business Essentials Guide provides you useful tools and templates to help grow your business and save you time with automated shipping solutions.
- Save time with the UPS Business Essentials Guide
-
-
Smart Tech
Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen.
Find out more
-
Smart Business
Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful.
More Smart Advice
-
Smart People
The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches.
Learn More



