On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 10:
Next »
malicious payloads vs. remote controlled botnets
in my opinion, zotob was an extension of the ethical belief that spyware writers have. backdoor access with remote command execution capabilities for advertising, identity theft or DDoS based attacks seem, to me, most common.

the potential intent of those in control of bot-nets are what truly makes zotob seem so potentially devistating.

pre-programmed malicious payloads would be more anonymous all while sacraficing future control of infected machines.

ego may be the definative answer.
Posted by: nynetsec   Posted on: 10/26/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

malicious payloads vs. remote controlled botnets  nynetsec | 10/26/05
I won't consider them a fool but...  Grayson Peddie | 10/26/05
These numbers are BS  toadlife | 10/26/05
Maybe not...  gfeier | 10/27/05
Understanding survey results  NTBugtraq | 10/27/05
Hello Russ  toadlife | 10/27/05
correction  toadlife | 10/27/05
correction  toadlife | 10/27/05
A beautiful piece if coding!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 10/27/05
Zotob damage deep but not widespread  bryanpeabody | 02/22/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc