On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 17:
« Previous
Tap Is Not a '"Tap"" Anymore
The reason 'tap is used,with the insertion of 'wire''is the fact of the intersecting union involved in the 'line' of traditional phone systems.

I agree with the articles author here.Although it is a little soft to contend that of the statement'it-may-cost-too-much-to-implement'. It reaches the bases of course. But the well intended statement would simply bounce of the 'airs of security solutions looking for another coin in the wishing well.

The ideal that this would make systems more vulnerable is much more palatable.Since to actually do this the 'machine'would be roled up ,a 'gap'in the client to server connection where another 'server would simply be 'inserted into the connective 'line the provider would be utilizing. ( Of course the service provider could simply change the role of a given machine to do this processing already 'in-line).
Thing about this is that however a server can handle thousands of connections.Not just a single one - wich incidently still should require warrant. Another is the fact that if the engineering of the desired 'tap'requires involving 'decrypting' back doors. I couldn't go for allowing,even descreetly making this even with a 'plausible warrant to be something mandatory within software development. Since this was developed to make the person secure,its method is that of having a secure conversation.The IP of the software would have to be given to the 'powers that be supposedly on request.
Simply using VOIP in consideration of further regulation,even on admission of the traditional switched,or otherwise networked as criteria for have this 'tap'regulation,isn't complete enough reason in stipulation of law. VOIP is simple,and its very acronymn spells usage other than traditional technology. In wich 'tap'cannot simply idealise making a connection in union of a wired line.
In any event.The govy should not generalize communication in detail of 'blanket monitors over the vast quantities that servers do.
The entry here of involving the FCCs delineation of 'information service,verses 'communication service is also controversial.When for such curcumstances as copyright for example,the 'broadcast flag'has been told to not be utilized.Yet new technologies such as that of blue-ray,will consist of 'internet connected devices,wich already control the "tort" of invading the privacy of the 'line',and devices involved with it.The differences between cable,and phone simply being mute between them as a 'cable card'would (in case of IPTV) have either/or/both involved to the technology.
This is what will probably take place,the propriety acting as a private agent will simply 'blackmail'the person of the premise ,this to then precipitate 'self law in police powers . Claiming the relationship of 'tap is theirs in any given presumption anyway. The govy will go along with this since it is not all that apharent that to make the private entity an assecory to an unconstitutionality does not readily apear in this relationship. Being hidden behind copyright architecture.
So while they are stating one thing.They will be doing another.But having power within the question so that the public must 'charge'them to this affair.At the publics expense.Rather than having the ideals more finely defined via what technology is involved.
VOIP is a simple mechanism.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 10/29/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Good!  John L. Ries | 10/24/05
Fight for Freedom  ciociario | 10/25/05
What planet have you been living on ?  bravescott@... | 10/25/05
Last I heard......  bravescott@... | 10/25/05
Planet earth,...  Spoon Jabber | 10/25/05
Fight for freedom  Middle of the Road | 10/26/05
Fight for Freedom  ciociario | 10/26/05
Guess we just CC: the feds before long  shawkins | 10/25/05
Five scenarios  Ngallendou | 10/25/05
No regulation is best regulation  terry flores | 10/25/05
Message has been deleted.  Spoon Jabber | 10/25/05
Terriorists  Middle of the Road | 10/26/05
?????????  Middle of the Road | 10/26/05
why is there a crown vic' in my driveway?  nynetsec | 10/25/05
ciociario's posts may SEEM like rants BUT  btljooz | 10/26/05
Regulatory overreach  johnfarnham@... | 10/26/05
Tap Is Not a '"Tap"" Anymore  ParadigmOdyssey | 10/29/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here