FBI Net-wiretapping rules face challenges

TalkBack 2 of 17:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Fight for Freedom

Wow how blatant is this. Basically if anyone ever questioned what this phony war on terror was to achieve it is total and complete control over the populous?.the return to serfdom. If the demonic cabal of elitists gets there way this will user in the nightmare era of BIG BOTHER such as was portrayed in the movie BRAZIL. Is this what people really want?

Before America invaded Iraq and Afghanistan and now perhaps even Iran, these nations posed no military, political or economic threat to the US. In fact Saddam and the American administration were bosom buddies. American administrations have always enjoyed a cozy relationship with dictators and other despots around the world. The people in those countries resented their dictator and the American support they got but they did not hate or wish to blow up Americans. When American troops were first thought by the Iraqians to be a liberating force, they cheered and supported the US solders. Only after that the US showed itself to be an invading force did they do what all nationals should do and what any American would do if invaded and that is defend them selves. Thus even though the US has created its own problems though imperial behavior, it is a long stretch to say that poor peasant farmers desperate to defend there land, freedom and way of life have organized a group with the money and high teck equipment to come to America and slip in afford to pay rent while accessing former intelligence agencies of the USSR or the current agencies of the US, Brittan and Israel for access to these nations biological or nuclear weapons. Look at Britton. Through all it wars with France, Spain and the US and imperial invasion in Ireland, India, China and Africa never once did it have to impose dictatorial laws of total surveillance over its populous in order to ?defend? her freedom. This is in fact a contradictory statement. A nation cannot defend freedom by taking it away. The end result would be to achieve for the supposed invaders what the government says it intends to defend against. And if a government will go to court if necessary (or just send in the army) to impose dictatorial powers then we know that is there ultimate aim and the supposed war on terror the modus operandi. NO democratic government goes to court to fight the will of the majority of its people, then that government has violated the tents of its covenant with the people.

Now Americans will see which Civil Liberty groups are for real and the ones which are a ruse set up to make people think there is someone looking after there interests. Irregardless all peoples in the world not just U.S. citizens should protest in the same vain as the freedom marches of the 60?s, for liberty is truly at stake.

Silent voices of decent today will never be heard of tomorrow.

Posted by: ciociario   Posted on: 10/25/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• Five Steps to Determine When to Virtualize YourServers VMware Server virtualization isn't just for big companies. Entry-level ... Download Now