On mySimon: Radius Toothbrush
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 20 of 103:
Next »
« Previous
duh
What part of "The virus affects computers running Windows versions 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000 and XP."
did you miss? Why do people post without reading the article?????
Posted by: tlyon   Posted on: 01/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

missing vulnerable OS description  rgriffith64@... | 01/26/04
How Disengenuous of You...  Confused by religion | 01/26/04
It's an executable file not an .exe  voska | 01/26/04
Sorry - my bad!  Confused by religion | 01/26/04
same old story, all over again...  mactek.net | 01/26/04
Nope  rpmyers1 | 01/26/04
Um simple answer to that!  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
What?  Spoon Jabber | 01/26/04
Spoon Jabber and mkIIISupra  rpmyers1 | 01/26/04
Linux not worth it  John Zern | 01/27/04
you're funny...  ryusen | 01/27/04
Ignorant  d_jedi | 01/27/04
You said it!!  X Marks The Spot | 01/26/04
Windows was specifically mentioned  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
This is quoted from the story:  Bill4 | 01/26/04
Huh?  daryll@... | 01/26/04
Article was changed.  rgriffith64@... | 01/27/04
Re: missing vulnerable OS description  issthatso | 01/27/04
Look again  kuch | 01/27/04
duh  tlyon | 01/27/04
missing vulnerable OS description - NOT!  horusfalcon | 01/29/04
Getting smarter...  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
Linsux  Fred Flintsone | 01/26/04
virus infect systems from win95 to xp  mactek.net | 01/26/04
Bully for you!  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
Bully for you...  dsentman@... | 01/26/04
Your welcome.  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
Wow...  Martin Marvinski | 01/26/04
Bully for you...  dsentman@... | 01/26/04
I'm with you  IT_User | 01/26/04
Virus free since 1987?  epflaum@... | 01/27/04
Overblown...  Mike Cox | 01/26/04
And all this time, I thought you were serious  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
New here?  Martin Marvinski | 01/26/04
I still say he needs his own column  Nullifidian | 01/27/04
I agree, give Cox his own column  el1jones | 01/27/04
You should hire new MCSE's  toadlife | 01/27/04
Overblown?????  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Thanks  michael-t | 01/26/04
MCSE's on call....  Mike Cox | 01/26/04
no mail filtering?  Suicida| | 01/26/04
Irresponsible? YES!  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Only one special thing about this  braindigitalis | 01/26/04
New virus ?  worknman | 01/26/04
---New virus hitting in-boxes---  NoB$ | 01/26/04
It's a Trojan, not a virus  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
Good tips, here are mine...  Fred Fredrickson | 01/26/04
No external files?  braindigitalis | 01/26/04
No external files? A bit extreme...  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
Hmmm - not up on the latest abilities in Outlook I see...  Confused by religion | 01/26/04
I think they mean Outlook Express when they say Outlook  voska | 01/27/04
Good Idea.... BUT!  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Why No Webmail ???  nikoli | 01/27/04
This can work too, however...  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
BAD ADVICE!  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Step one could be a problem  Spoon Jabber | 01/26/04
The steps are layered....  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
Once again  TWRX | 01/26/04
Not entirely true  rpmyers1 | 01/26/04
first ever virus  braindigitalis | 01/26/04
I doubt that...  kray_z | 01/26/04
Quite true  TWRX | 01/27/04
Ironic  TWRX | 01/27/04
You were born last month?  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
And AGAIN....  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
For the record.  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
re: for the record  IT-man_z | 01/26/04
Administrative Nightmare: to & from ficticious users  Jefferis Peterson | 01/26/04
mail spoofing sucks  Suicida| | 01/26/04
Nightmare is right.  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Bully for you...  dsentman@... | 01/26/04
im with you, eastview  MrNik | 01/27/04
Another ABMer beating his chest.  NoB$ | 01/27/04
Amazing; they did it again.  Anton Philidor | 01/26/04
Yes, truly amazing  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/27/04
Tech support rep here  nikoli | 01/27/04
Yes, truly amazing  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/27/04
Yes, truly amazing  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/27/04
Stone tires  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/27/04
Automation doesn't help  John L. Ries | 01/27/04
Not always people you don't know  Andyvan | 01/27/04
And your point is?  BXLE | 01/27/04
Well, the Linux "commune"ity  rkadowns | 01/27/04
Not hardly  STDog | 01/27/04
Message from Mac and Linux users  miataclub | 01/27/04
happy  Jefferis Peterson | 01/27/04
Fool me once, shame on you...fool me twice, shame on me...  JJ_z | 01/27/04
Forged headers can fool you  Andyvan | 01/27/04
Linux Fans Spreading Windows Viruses  Zuel | 01/27/04
You're guessing  Arrg | 01/27/04
Idea!  MkIIISupra | 01/27/04
So windows users attacked OS projects?  STDog | 01/27/04
payback  lengua99 | 01/31/04
I was just getting to the second paragraph  Arrg | 01/27/04
I Agree 100%  wadeprater | 01/27/04
Do you know........  nite_w0lf | 01/27/04
really?  lengua99 | 01/31/04
Panda Software offers a cure  iayerbe | 01/27/04
Better cure than Panda  ddollinger | 01/29/04
Linux not worth the programming effort  John Zern | 01/27/04
For The Love Of Pete...  nikoli | 01/27/04
Idiots on the Net? How wierd.  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Pretty nasty and misleading....  Andrej.G. | 01/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement