On CBS MoneyWatch: 10 Most Expensive U.S. Colleges
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 103:
Next »
« Previous
Article was changed.
The original article was posted at 2:46pm PT or so if my memory is correct. The current version has a 5:58pm PT stamp.

The article was changed. I read the original twice and scanned it three or more times looking for any Windows mention. XP or 2000 would have stood out to my eyes. I claim it was not there in the original.
Posted by: rgriffith64@...   Posted on: 01/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

missing vulnerable OS description  rgriffith64@... | 01/26/04
How Disengenuous of You...  Confused by religion | 01/26/04
It's an executable file not an .exe  voska | 01/26/04
Sorry - my bad!  Confused by religion | 01/26/04
same old story, all over again...  mactek.net | 01/26/04
Nope  rpmyers1 | 01/26/04
Um simple answer to that!  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
What?  Spoon Jabber | 01/26/04
Spoon Jabber and mkIIISupra  rpmyers1 | 01/26/04
Linux not worth it  John Zern | 01/27/04
you're funny...  ryusen | 01/27/04
Ignorant  d_jedi | 01/27/04
You said it!!  X Marks The Spot | 01/26/04
Windows was specifically mentioned  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
This is quoted from the story:  Bill4 | 01/26/04
Huh?  daryll@... | 01/26/04
Article was changed.  rgriffith64@... | 01/27/04
Re: missing vulnerable OS description  issthatso | 01/27/04
Look again  kuch | 01/27/04
duh  tlyon | 01/27/04
missing vulnerable OS description - NOT!  horusfalcon | 01/29/04
Getting smarter...  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
Linsux  Fred Flintsone | 01/26/04
virus infect systems from win95 to xp  mactek.net | 01/26/04
Bully for you!  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
Bully for you...  dsentman@... | 01/26/04
Your welcome.  MkIIISupra | 01/26/04
Wow...  Martin Marvinski | 01/26/04
Bully for you...  dsentman@... | 01/26/04
I'm with you  IT_User | 01/26/04
Virus free since 1987?  epflaum@... | 01/27/04
Overblown...  Mike Cox | 01/26/04
And all this time, I thought you were serious  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
New here?  Martin Marvinski | 01/26/04
I still say he needs his own column  Nullifidian | 01/27/04
I agree, give Cox his own column  el1jones | 01/27/04
You should hire new MCSE's  toadlife | 01/27/04
Overblown?????  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Thanks  michael-t | 01/26/04
MCSE's on call....  Mike Cox | 01/26/04
no mail filtering?  Suicida| | 01/26/04
Irresponsible? YES!  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Only one special thing about this  braindigitalis | 01/26/04
New virus ?  worknman | 01/26/04
---New virus hitting in-boxes---  NoB$ | 01/26/04
It's a Trojan, not a virus  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
Good tips, here are mine...  Fred Fredrickson | 01/26/04
No external files?  braindigitalis | 01/26/04
No external files? A bit extreme...  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
Hmmm - not up on the latest abilities in Outlook I see...  Confused by religion | 01/26/04
I think they mean Outlook Express when they say Outlook  voska | 01/27/04
Good Idea.... BUT!  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Why No Webmail ???  nikoli | 01/27/04
This can work too, however...  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
BAD ADVICE!  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Step one could be a problem  Spoon Jabber | 01/26/04
The steps are layered....  Heatlesssun | 01/26/04
Once again  TWRX | 01/26/04
Not entirely true  rpmyers1 | 01/26/04
first ever virus  braindigitalis | 01/26/04
I doubt that...  kray_z | 01/26/04
Quite true  TWRX | 01/27/04
Ironic  TWRX | 01/27/04
You were born last month?  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
And AGAIN....  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
For the record.  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
re: for the record  IT-man_z | 01/26/04
Administrative Nightmare: to & from ficticious users  Jefferis Peterson | 01/26/04
mail spoofing sucks  Suicida| | 01/26/04
Nightmare is right.  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Bully for you...  dsentman@... | 01/26/04
im with you, eastview  MrNik | 01/27/04
Another ABMer beating his chest.  NoB$ | 01/27/04
Amazing; they did it again.  Anton Philidor | 01/26/04
Yes, truly amazing  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/27/04
Tech support rep here  nikoli | 01/27/04
Yes, truly amazing  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/27/04
Yes, truly amazing  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/27/04
Stone tires  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/27/04
Automation doesn't help  John L. Ries | 01/27/04
Not always people you don't know  Andyvan | 01/27/04
And your point is?  BXLE | 01/27/04
Well, the Linux "commune"ity  rkadowns | 01/27/04
Not hardly  STDog | 01/27/04
Message from Mac and Linux users  miataclub | 01/27/04
happy  Jefferis Peterson | 01/27/04
Fool me once, shame on you...fool me twice, shame on me...  JJ_z | 01/27/04
Forged headers can fool you  Andyvan | 01/27/04
Linux Fans Spreading Windows Viruses  Zuel | 01/27/04
You're guessing  Arrg | 01/27/04
Idea!  MkIIISupra | 01/27/04
So windows users attacked OS projects?  STDog | 01/27/04
payback  lengua99 | 01/31/04
I was just getting to the second paragraph  Arrg | 01/27/04
I Agree 100%  wadeprater | 01/27/04
Do you know........  nite_w0lf | 01/27/04
really?  lengua99 | 01/31/04
Panda Software offers a cure  iayerbe | 01/27/04
Better cure than Panda  ddollinger | 01/29/04
Linux not worth the programming effort  John Zern | 01/27/04
For The Love Of Pete...  nikoli | 01/27/04
Idiots on the Net? How wierd.  jrbeaman | 01/27/04
Pretty nasty and misleading....  Andrej.G. | 01/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline