On The Insider: Criminal Past of Woods Mistress Revealed
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 13:
Next »
« Previous
mjb: Last go-around
"The electoral college is not a realistic representation of the voters."

But it was never intended to be. The electoral college system was set up to ensure that the large States didn't run roughshod over the small States; the same reason we have a Senate where every State has equal representation, regardless of population. Keep in mind, we don't live in a Democracy, we live in a Republic. If this were a true Democracy, the American people would vote on every single issue that the government now deals with. Why would we need a Congress, then?

"The power lies in Congress? True, but there is no minority voice in the Oval Office. And when Congress has the president's back, things can get ugly. "

Again, you're criticizing the 2-party system, not Bush. The same situation would exist (and has existed) if the President and Congress were both Democratic. Maybe the answer is to have a Constitutional requirement that Congress be of a different party than the President, or at least a certain percentage. But then, that would take away the right of the people to elect whomever they want. Which is more important?

"They attempted to outlaw the filibuster, thus hushing the minority voice, the constitutionally protected minority voice. That is nothing short of a threat to freedom, and a Hitler-ian attempt to create an elite ruling class."

There's nothing sacred about the filibuster; it has no basis in the Constitution. It's an artifice created by the Congress itself. There are other ways that a minority voice can be assured. Threats to the filibuster are no threat to anyone's freedom. Now, if the majority party of Congress were to restrict the minority's right to speak at all, that would be a threat to freedom.

Carl Rapson
Posted by: rapson   Posted on: 10/06/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Bad Timing  yyuko@... | 10/05/05
I thought Republicans were for smaller government?  Real World | 10/05/05
Here:  rapson | 10/05/05
Yeah, and General Bush  Real World | 10/05/05
Term limits ??  Update victim | 10/05/05
Why not?  rapson | 10/05/05
In theory, I agree with everything you say  Real World | 10/05/05
Right conclusion, wrong target  rapson | 10/06/05
It's the little things  Real World | 10/06/05
mjb: Last go-around  rapson | 10/06/05
A federal law should set minimum standards, which  Update victim | 10/05/05
What does the bill do?  Cardinal_Bill | 10/05/05
Bush will never sign it...  BitTwiddler | 10/06/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here