On TV.com: HANK Stank, Now It's Canceled
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 3:
Next »
Correction to story
"Specter and Leahy introduced an amended version of their June proposal. The new version omits a section that would have severely restricted the sale and use of social security numbers by businesses and other entities. According to a committee representative, the provision was dropped because another congressional committee has jurisdiction over such regulations."

"Leahy said in a floor speech Wednesday that various stakeholders had come together to make the bill better balanced." Those stakeholders paid enough money to convince the good Senators to drop the provision.

Sorry for the confusion.
Posted by: Squawkbox   Posted on: 09/30/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Correction to story  Squawkbox | 09/30/05
weasels  zclayton2 | 10/05/05
Why is there no link directly to the legislation? (NT)  Update victim | 10/03/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement