On TechRepublic: FREE download: Social networking policy
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 46 of 57:
Next »
« Previous
What Gives
Its only been 6 mos. since there was any kind of 'product via 'digital types from the media conglomerates. Finally there is actually true,original (non-counterfit),products being sold of wich someone,anyone can purchase - and enjoy the music.

'Video (movies) hasn't done this yet.They are available,but not as readily recognizable,as the music availabity,wich now has at least 6 well known easily found venues to choose from.

Whatever the media if it is of the copyrighted type,it will take 'education for the authors to make their product viable for the person of consumer as they are within a 'digital utility.

Copyrighted products wich (as a feature of the copyright,not necesarilly a feature of the distribution) :

Copy as a feature of the work.
Storage in digital form as feature of the work.
Device to Device as a feature of the work.
Performance/communication as a feature of the work.


This is only a short list,and work'' can be replaced with 'copyright,or product. How these medias 'do their thing,is in reality, - how they depend between each other to do business. The most the copyright agenda is to fear,is that among 'other copyrighted works,rather than the consumer,or actual counterfitting (pirating).

As for RIAA,there has not been a case before a court of wich 'home-audio recording act viable 'practices has had anything to speak of for a consumer. This is something of wich most (almost 95%) of controversial 'file swapping is consistent of - somebodies 'fair-use dub,a home video recording,..of wich it is believed that these are still in 'fair-use''when they are using a one-to-many situation,..or even as well- an exhibition,with a communicative curcumstance wich does so.

RIAA,along with other media conglomerates,would like to simply bypass this relationship of 'fair-use altogether. The FCC has not heard of a relationship (found in court),in wich a 'fair-use consumers functioning in their livelyhood could as well be considered along with the now inclusive 'broadcast flag. It is believed that along with DMCA,the security of a copyright,is more relevent than the utility that is given within digital between either 'the person of the authored work,or the person of the 'user owner of the work.

To make this shorter,the idea of a full court distribution via 'new technologies such as those using HDTV,digital cable etc,telephony included wich do not adhere within the knowledge in the viability of the digital utility,that is acknoledge the actual relationship with some kind of standard,will stand to be continued to the dogma of wich copyrighted articles present themselves as each among consumer,and copyright holder sees today.

For what appears to be a great advent of newer expanding market for 'media,-as in music,movies,books even websites wich are copyrighted, should be by any cadence of thought,replaced with a greater adjucent idea of 'communication within the 'usage of those component devices. That is through broadband technology - the factoring feature known of its promotion should be moreso communication outside of the copyrighted agenda. With the copyright promotions being a lesser extent of the technology than the communicative curcumstance.

And example in fact is sure,if you want to buy book,dvds,watch theatre movies,read web pages,and continue that this is an advent to the future - you need only compare that existent relationship in market to the vast untouched market of communication via these same accessories,. Within there present forms,they compose 95% of the functionality to that extent of wich a copyright agenda within its technology stands to oppose,if nothing else besides pure envy of the descrprency for the right to choose ones time to communicate vrs 'consume passive copyrighted works.

The medias realize that the actual market cannot grow much larger in the functional aspect of the 'real devices.As there is not that much 'timewise relationship to anybodies use of these devices (even at unimaginable speeds) wich is within the lifestyle reach of most consumers.

Problem exist of these copyright agendas becuase of the extremely deliberate business clause relationships posed via either of : patent,liscence,contract..or supplemental authority of usage.

Each of these problems are advent of present day consumers wich do not adhere to the impression of exhibitions that are portrayed by these 'facility of device bodies.

If it was that the Sonys,Panasonics,Pioneers,HP,Dell,Microsofts of the world would take the larger 95% market look of just what the communicative aspect pertains to the admiration of their usefullness could be attained as respectfull outside of the carnic bliss of the copyrighted medias agenda.

It has been noted that 'communication devices actually 'compete with 'copyright media for 'timeshare within the lifestyles of persons agenda. It should be noted that doing this without recognizing them beyond the mention of those medias in not only not making anybody any money,it is not fullfilling the 95% of wich that market is made up of.

Rhetoric is taken up in this when anymember included,-is still considering a premise of piracy,vrs a premise of 'feature in digital utility. Denoting either,and still deciding that further work,or necesity can be quenched via 'the opposing 'communication variations use of the same equipment(s).

These component makers are afraid of change.It is the fear among themselves wich may not 'ever be alayed to rest.

Meanwhile we just want to communicate.Audio,Visual,interaction.The technology is there,and the ignorance of this is the extreme of blissfull.



-just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 01/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Some folks are REAL slow learners...  realitycheck101 | 01/16/04
Get a life Itty  SloooeShflu | 01/16/04
What about the money?  WhoIsDaMan | 01/16/04
Not enough  RedHat9User | 01/16/04
You're just jealous!  WhoIsDaMan | 01/16/04
actually  RedHat9User | 01/16/04
funny  fr33dom101@... | 01/16/04
Mike!  BitTwiddler | 01/16/04
thx for the tip  prrawlins | 01/16/04
Jail time, haha...  Delaware Boy | 01/16/04
Garnishing Wage would have an economic impact  voska | 01/16/04
Diminishing Returns  Publius_z | 01/16/04
Plus  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Arrrg me m8ty  Pongo13 | 01/18/04
The Courts arern't likely to "up the fines"....  James T. Kirk | 01/16/04
What fines?  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Why?  d_jedi | 01/19/04
There hasn't been a court case yet  voska | 01/16/04
who's dumb?  ryusen | 01/16/04
Sure....  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Guess they're finally swapping songs they bought  FilledOut | 01/16/04
Time for a few more "examples".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/16/04
Maybe not  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Or maybe no one cares anymore the way you do Itty  SloooeShflu | 01/16/04
Agreed  Robert Crocker | 01/16/04
It's called fair use  voska | 01/16/04
The big difference  tic swayback | 01/16/04
better than trying to find loopholes  ryusen | 01/16/04
Tough against a cartel  tic swayback | 01/16/04
i understand your point...  ryusen | 01/16/04
They sort of have  tic swayback | 01/17/04
Contracts? More like indentured servitude agreements!  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Congress disagrees with you  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Examples don't work, look at the stats  voska | 01/16/04
Lets sum this up.  doe_z | 01/16/04
Re: Lets sum this up  Publius_z | 01/16/04
The Courts have NEVER declared P2P illegal  bidemytime | 01/16/04
The settlers have settled  StorageGuru | 01/16/04
The Courts have NEVER declared P2P illegal  prrawlins | 01/16/04
p2p is legal  el1jones | 01/16/04
To put a finer point on it  bidemytime | 01/16/04
exactly  JWatson77 | 01/17/04
Correction  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Bogus studies  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Like we should give a hoot!  smarti21@... | 01/16/04
What Gives  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/16/04
enough of this foolishness  Louisiana oilman | 01/16/04
Time to listen to music  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Why surprised and why not?  solprovider | 01/16/04
Not always free  Louisiana oilman | 01/16/04
How about this  voska | 01/16/04
Correction  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Big Suprise  hetar | 01/16/04
Good Point  voska | 01/16/04
Another good point  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Plz explain  Pongo13 | 01/18/04
discounts available  tic swayback | 01/20/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here