On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 57:
Next »
« Previous
Maybe not
Sorry, but the current strategy does not seem to be
working. If the RIAA chooses to smack their own heads
against the wall a little harder, it's still not going to make a
difference.

Now personally, I don't buy the data from any of these
"studies" (see my other post below), but even if you do
believe them, fileswapping is still a massively popular
practice. The lawsuits may perhaps have scared off a tiny
minority of sharers, but that's about it. Has this decreased
the availability of music online? Clearly, no. Has the huge
expense in legal bills racked up by the RIAA been paid for
by increased sales to those who would have previously
been downloading? Clearly, no.

There comes a point when one has to realize that one's
strategy is not working, and a new strategy needs to be
employed.
Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 01/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Some folks are REAL slow learners...  realitycheck101 | 01/16/04
Get a life Itty  SloooeShflu | 01/16/04
What about the money?  WhoIsDaMan | 01/16/04
Not enough  RedHat9User | 01/16/04
You're just jealous!  WhoIsDaMan | 01/16/04
actually  RedHat9User | 01/16/04
funny  fr33dom101@... | 01/16/04
Mike!  BitTwiddler | 01/16/04
thx for the tip  prrawlins | 01/16/04
Jail time, haha...  Delaware Boy | 01/16/04
Garnishing Wage would have an economic impact  voska | 01/16/04
Diminishing Returns  Publius_z | 01/16/04
Plus  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Arrrg me m8ty  Pongo13 | 01/18/04
The Courts arern't likely to "up the fines"....  James T. Kirk | 01/16/04
What fines?  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Why?  d_jedi | 01/19/04
There hasn't been a court case yet  voska | 01/16/04
who's dumb?  ryusen | 01/16/04
Sure....  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Guess they're finally swapping songs they bought  FilledOut | 01/16/04
Time for a few more "examples".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/16/04
Maybe not  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Or maybe no one cares anymore the way you do Itty  SloooeShflu | 01/16/04
Agreed  Robert Crocker | 01/16/04
It's called fair use  voska | 01/16/04
The big difference  tic swayback | 01/16/04
better than trying to find loopholes  ryusen | 01/16/04
Tough against a cartel  tic swayback | 01/16/04
i understand your point...  ryusen | 01/16/04
They sort of have  tic swayback | 01/17/04
Contracts? More like indentured servitude agreements!  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Congress disagrees with you  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Examples don't work, look at the stats  voska | 01/16/04
Lets sum this up.  doe_z | 01/16/04
Re: Lets sum this up  Publius_z | 01/16/04
The Courts have NEVER declared P2P illegal  bidemytime | 01/16/04
The settlers have settled  StorageGuru | 01/16/04
The Courts have NEVER declared P2P illegal  prrawlins | 01/16/04
p2p is legal  el1jones | 01/16/04
To put a finer point on it  bidemytime | 01/16/04
exactly  JWatson77 | 01/17/04
Correction  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Bogus studies  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Like we should give a hoot!  smarti21@... | 01/16/04
What Gives  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/16/04
enough of this foolishness  Louisiana oilman | 01/16/04
Time to listen to music  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Why surprised and why not?  solprovider | 01/16/04
Not always free  Louisiana oilman | 01/16/04
How about this  voska | 01/16/04
Correction  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Big Suprise  hetar | 01/16/04
Good Point  voska | 01/16/04
Another good point  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Plz explain  Pongo13 | 01/18/04
discounts available  tic swayback | 01/20/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here