On BNET: Ten ways to spot a dead-end job
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 35 of 57:
Next »
« Previous
Lets sum this up.
They set up a study where they got 40,000 volunteers to install spyware and 5000 to take a survey. Totaling 45,000 volunteers who's makeup represented the millions of internet users.

And when they saw these volunteers doing something (like deleting illegal music) they assumed the internet community at large was doing it too.

Ummm, did they take into consideration the HUGE impact their very observation had on these volunteers' actions? The conclusions are only valid if the observers themselves aren't affecting the very results they are recording. Who in their right mind would act normal (let alone, bad) while there is a person watching and recording everything they do over their shoulder.

Its like a mom saying "My 7 year old never steals cookies from the jar! I put it right next to him and been looking at him for the last 5 hours. He hasn't touched it."
Posted by: doe_z   Posted on: 01/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Some folks are REAL slow learners...  realitycheck101 | 01/16/04
Get a life Itty  SloooeShflu | 01/16/04
What about the money?  WhoIsDaMan | 01/16/04
Not enough  RedHat9User | 01/16/04
You're just jealous!  WhoIsDaMan | 01/16/04
actually  RedHat9User | 01/16/04
funny  fr33dom101@... | 01/16/04
Mike!  BitTwiddler | 01/16/04
thx for the tip  prrawlins | 01/16/04
Jail time, haha...  Delaware Boy | 01/16/04
Garnishing Wage would have an economic impact  voska | 01/16/04
Diminishing Returns  Publius_z | 01/16/04
Plus  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Arrrg me m8ty  Pongo13 | 01/18/04
The Courts arern't likely to "up the fines"....  James T. Kirk | 01/16/04
What fines?  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Why?  d_jedi | 01/19/04
There hasn't been a court case yet  voska | 01/16/04
who's dumb?  ryusen | 01/16/04
Sure....  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Guess they're finally swapping songs they bought  FilledOut | 01/16/04
Time for a few more "examples".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/16/04
Maybe not  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Or maybe no one cares anymore the way you do Itty  SloooeShflu | 01/16/04
Agreed  Robert Crocker | 01/16/04
It's called fair use  voska | 01/16/04
The big difference  tic swayback | 01/16/04
better than trying to find loopholes  ryusen | 01/16/04
Tough against a cartel  tic swayback | 01/16/04
i understand your point...  ryusen | 01/16/04
They sort of have  tic swayback | 01/17/04
Contracts? More like indentured servitude agreements!  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Congress disagrees with you  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Examples don't work, look at the stats  voska | 01/16/04
Lets sum this up.  doe_z | 01/16/04
Re: Lets sum this up  Publius_z | 01/16/04
The Courts have NEVER declared P2P illegal  bidemytime | 01/16/04
The settlers have settled  StorageGuru | 01/16/04
The Courts have NEVER declared P2P illegal  prrawlins | 01/16/04
p2p is legal  el1jones | 01/16/04
To put a finer point on it  bidemytime | 01/16/04
exactly  JWatson77 | 01/17/04
Correction  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Bogus studies  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Like we should give a hoot!  smarti21@... | 01/16/04
What Gives  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/16/04
enough of this foolishness  Louisiana oilman | 01/16/04
Time to listen to music  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Why surprised and why not?  solprovider | 01/16/04
Not always free  Louisiana oilman | 01/16/04
How about this  voska | 01/16/04
Correction  tic swayback | 01/16/04
Big Suprise  hetar | 01/16/04
Good Point  voska | 01/16/04
Another good point  AbsolutelyNot | 01/20/04
Plz explain  Pongo13 | 01/18/04
discounts available  tic swayback | 01/20/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here