On The Insider: Robert Pattinson's New Leading Lady
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 35:
Next »
« Previous
Verizon *require* SPF already
"About 1 million domains currently publish SPF records, Microsoft said."

SPF is not SenderID, Sender ID is some overcomplicated 'enhanced and embraced' Microsoft version that requires a license from them to use.

SenderID can read SPF records, so stick to SPF.
With the current problems with the EU Commission, it's safer not to use any software that requires a license, since the terms of the license grant an IP right and breaches of IP rights may become crimes in EU -> breaches of contracts can result in a crime. You'd be dumb to voluntarily expose your company to criminal prosecution based on one of MS's 'tricky-dickey' contracts.

" For spammers, publishing a valid record means they will pass that part of a spam check."

You WANT the spammers to put up SPF records because it lets them be reliably filtered by blacklists. Without authentification they can pretend to be from some another domain, with it, they can only pretend to be themselves -> easy filtering.

Also maybe you hadn't noticed by Verizon already uses SPF:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/whitelist/request_form.asp?id=isp

You either publish an SPF record, or apply to be whitelisted on their system. It's works so it is possible to filter using SPF now. I think they also default to allowing an IP address to send email, so if the mailserver and domain resolve to the same IP address they seem to allow that through by default.

If Verizon can do it, so can anyone else.
Posted by: Nigel Johnstone   Posted on: 08/09/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Worthless?  Otto_Delete | 08/09/05
Not necessarily  FamilyManFirst | 08/09/05
Blackholes  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
Re: not necessarily  Otto_Delete | 08/09/05
SPEWS  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
Verizon *require* SPF already  Nigel Johnstone | 08/09/05
Stargate.com  alaricd | 08/09/05
I agree!  Brian@... | 08/09/05
0.0.0.0? I don't see the problem(s)  Nigel Johnstone | 08/09/05
Alaric?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
Too late  Bill4 | 08/09/05
But Verizon doesn't get spam from you!  Nigel Johnstone | 08/09/05
SPAM: headers  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
Only sort of  Nigel Johnstone | 08/09/05
Spoofing IP  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
publish an SPF record  Apple ipod | 05/28/07
Fool-proof Method for Stopping SPAM  coffeenite | 08/09/05
And just HOW is Spam sent?  BitTwiddler | 08/09/05
And by people like the SpamKing  balsover | 08/09/05
It's All Windows Fault And That's A Fact  itanalyst | 08/09/05
Self-contradiction  Real World | 08/09/05
75%  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
If they're that dumb, they need drool-resistant keyboards  balsover | 08/09/05
The problem is  Real World | 08/09/05
Missed the point  rapson | 08/09/05
Why do analysts often seem so clueless?  balsover | 08/09/05
I Don't Necessarily Put The Blame On Analysts  itanalyst | 08/09/05
Your post seems a bit off topic, it has nothing to do with Linux vs MS  balsover | 08/09/05
That's Why They Have Dual Boot  itanalyst | 08/09/05
Burning  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
DNSBL  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/09/05
MS' own fault  John L. Ries | 08/09/05
their real goal  Apple ipod | 05/28/07
MS, Remove license strings from SenderID ... and the world will come.  Plain Logic | 08/09/05
An alternative approach to fighting Spam & phishing  secureplay_z | 08/11/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here