On last.fm: Radiohead - Listen free and discover!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 50:
Next »
« Previous
Time to 'pay' for the long-term consequences of
``Not so much built-in security as the lack of built-in insecurity. A mail client with a bug in JPEG rendering is going to be vulnerable no matter the platform. You just don't see mail clients set up to execute attachments by default much of anywhere but Microsoft.''

'junk-s/w' MUCH LIKE paying for the same in junk-food.

MS built-in almos everything in the kernel so that their apps would have a smooth sail access to its functions. Now that their shoddy code (junk-s/w) is already there the damage is built-in (clogged arteries/liver, etc.)

time to pay the consequences of the LOW of wisdom + HIGH greed.
Posted by: michael_t   Posted on: 08/02/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

If there are no Linux Viruses ...  ShadeTree | 08/01/05
thats an easy answer..  Monkey_MCSE | 08/01/05
damn enter key  Monkey_MCSE | 08/01/05
Rephrased  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/01/05
Time to 'pay' for the long-term consequences of  michael_t | 08/02/05
Since the Windows servers ...  ShadeTree | 08/01/05
Typhoid Mary!  osreinstall | 08/01/05
Why wait?  In_the_end_I_Win | 08/01/05
It is a pretty good strategy  osreinstall | 08/01/05
Been waiting since 99...  Linux User 147560 | 08/01/05
The APACHE http server case invalidates your statement. (n)  michael_t | 08/02/05
That just proves virus authors are linux fanboys! - (NT)  osreinstall | 08/02/05
Apache knocker was a worm  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/05
It doesn't matter  osreinstall | 08/02/05
Look on the bright side  John Zern | 08/01/05
Try again, not free!  ShadeTree | 08/01/05
But you can't charge for anything built on Linux  John Zern | 08/01/05
RE: But you can't charge for anything built on Linux  nightshade0143 | 08/01/05
Only if it *includes* Linux  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/01/05
Mostly to filter out the MS WINDOWS malware.  michael_t | 08/01/05
But...  rapson | 08/01/05
Many organizations deploy mail relays in UNIX/Linux  michael_t | 08/01/05
Once again, if you have a mail firewall ...  ShadeTree | 08/01/05
From 1000s of users who take their  michael_t | 08/01/05
Those 1000 Windows users that ...  ShadeTree | 08/02/05
When the MS windows laptops return  michael_t | 08/02/05
It is impossible to protect code from running ...  ShadeTree | 08/02/05
"UNIX Platorms", i.e., h.w + OS  michael_t | 08/02/05
Per your request  ShadeTree | 08/02/05
Poor Shady ... ALL these HAVE ALREADY BEEN addressed  michael_t | 08/02/05
Poor Michael doesn't even realize what he asked for!  ShadeTree | 08/02/05
If you want to know about current vulnerabilities ...  ShadeTree | 08/02/05
Study CURRENTLY OPEN cases NOT ONES CLOSED 6-8 Years AGO, shady..  michael_t | 08/02/05
You said nothing about open and I cut and ...  ShadeTree | 08/02/05
Maybe some need it for their sadboxed virus creation  Boot_Agnostic | 08/01/05
Virus Top-20 for July 2005 : -)  michael_t | 08/01/05
"as it comes more and more online in the United States..."  HypnoToad | 08/01/05
Next Microsoft Acquisition  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/01/05
Kaspersky debuts Linux antivirus in the U.S.  Loverock Davidson | 08/01/05
RE: Kaspersky debuts Linux antivirus in the U.S.  nightshade0143 | 08/01/05
WTF???  kribor_z | 08/01/05
RE: WTF???  nightshade0143 | 08/01/05
You're brilliant  Bad Buoy | 08/01/05
RE: You're brilliant  nightshade0143 | 08/02/05
Vulnerability or feature?  jasonp@... | 08/07/05
Just plain stupid  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/05
Couldn't agree with you more  Linux User 147560 | 08/02/05
The real reason for Linux antivirus  netminder | 08/03/05
Hehehe ... I wish you would offer your experience earlier...  michael_t | 08/05/05
Linux Networks  edpol07 | 04/13/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here