Cisco details controversial router flaw

Then CISCO+ISS should be liable: "Good luck not using them!"

Seems to me that CISCO has been selling routers since April when it knew they had security faults.

That means:
That customers have knowingly been sold a dud and can have comback against CISCO for any consequences.

That CISCO should have reported this on their May 10Q since they are required to report all material things to their shareholders.

The liability for already sold routers is more tenuous sure, but if its found that CISCO has done this in the past then those customers can go after CISCO too since they were similarly deceived. They may be 80% of the routers but they're *not* the only maker, and they can be replaced.; Posted by: Nigel Johnstone Posted on: 07/29/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Reply to Story Reply to Message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Overly simplified. ShadeTree | 07/29/05

Then CISCO+ISS should be liable Nigel Johnstone | 07/29/05

I think what is meant is... John L. Ries | 07/29/05

Hmmm... zkiwi | 07/29/05

No, the concealment is the issue Nigel Johnstone | 07/29/05

Oh? zkiwi | 07/29/05

What do you think?

Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More