Rights issue dogs CD protection

TalkBack 44 of 51:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Thats the point

The new technology of wich 'labels have been keen to avoid or inlist should be more subsiding with the music publisher (artist,author etc.)that with the 'label,wich could have portrayed a given aspect through a given aesthetic utilized through the labels 'published technology.

The 'new technology should mean 'more say,more say to the aeshetic of publication. If it means more features,or less ,or if it means 'royalty,the denoting factor should be the wishes of the artist doing so.

Artists should 'dodge this situation to instore 'royalty of a given one-to-0ne retrospect.Since it is a well known fact that the knowing knowledge of holding your own self promotion,with choice to inscribe that benifit wich technology in todays digital terms define,is a key to invoicing that royalty,acceptability and authorities priviledge to do so through copyright.

An example,and my comment here is seriously sided to 'person of consumer,rather than 'premise of piracy...

Is for example,self promotion, the speakers at the HP doing the digital piracy thing. ... after 4 or five years of this .. an artist has to wonder what it will come to .. still bauking at a piracy premise ..

Any of those artists could have been 'promoting in public,a download site for their music. 'By the way HP has a device to hold music, and go to Itunes,or MusicMatch,or Rhapsody and 'get-my-music.

When it is clearly defined what control an artist can take to a forray of feature set of/in aesthetic it would be formidable for them to do so.Royalty doesn't as well need to be the only design,and feature -in-feature - value can prevail if it is an artist wishes to do so.

This is not to say,lets dump CDs as useless wasted technology. By no means.But with this 'example,as examples do to appearance sake,..
- and I could be an outsider looking in to this.
Stake that claim.Make it work.

There are many finaciers bidding aqauntance to the relevence of 'utility of digital copyrighted works.They dont have to take precedence over an artists relationship of rights to do so,wether it be royalty,or feature value. As long as you can tell the aesthetic is no longer a guise beyond your wishes of them.

There should be a great competition among these digital products.None should be trapped in a basis clause between aesthetic,and distribution differences.Those wich utilize a technology,and those wich utilize the right to do so as apherent to authored and copyrighted.


-just talking.Personally I would pay more for CDs.It wouldn't be the point if nobody could reach the artist out of this curcumstance.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 01/13/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now