On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 51:
Next »
« Previous
Hence the push to DVDA and SACD
The "Industry" wants to kill the insecure CD as a distribution medium. I agree with you, I want high quality as well as portablility. AAC and WMA are fine for good PC speakers but do not meet the test for my uses with high fidelity sound equipment. DVDA and SACD both sound outstanding and are allegedly copy proof. So it is AAC and WMA for those who care little for quality and worse yet, portablity. Those who care will have to hunt for those elusive DVDA and SACD disks. And I like iTunes but won't buy a lot unless they offer shn, flac or vorbis encoding -- lossless compression. Quality matters to me and I am happy to pay for it.
Posted by: Sunny Jalolly   Posted on: 01/13/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Digital locks, yeah right  FilledOut | 01/13/04
Yes, 2 copies on a CD = Pay Twice  Franklin_z | 01/13/04
re: Yes, 2 copies on a CD = Pay Twice  stephen732@... | 01/13/04
I think that the music companies have issues about this...  TrackStar1682 | 01/14/04
Avg extra cost less than $1 per CD  Sunny Jalolly | 01/13/04
while i do not think they shoudl pay twice  JWatson77 | 01/13/04
MORE PROTECTION = I BUY LESS happy  M_c | 01/13/04
Bwahahahahaha...  BitTwiddler | 01/13/04
Yes indeed......  shawkins | 01/13/04
Me, copyright infringement. You, technology  dcso580 | 01/14/04
I don't get it!  dg mh | 01/13/04
hypocrite  stephen732@... | 01/13/04
Those poor record company execs!  Chad_z | 01/13/04
Why didn't anyone question the sound quality?  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/13/04
Not even MP3  AbsolutelyNot | 01/13/04
Just more reasons to stop buying CDs  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/13/04
Hence the push to DVDA and SACD  Sunny Jalolly | 01/13/04
Only if it worths the money  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/13/04
And they wonder why we have piracy!!!  voska | 01/13/04
Huh?  tic swayback | 01/13/04
You can, that's pretty magical, teach me how  voska | 01/13/04
qualifications  tic swayback | 01/13/04
Lovely  tic swayback | 01/13/04
RIAA forms their own police force  tic swayback | 01/13/04
ZDNN COVER THIS STORY!!  cybershoplifter | 01/13/04
That's illegal Search and Seizure here in Canada  voska | 01/13/04
50 Cent, Sheryl Crow hoodwinked by RIAA  tic swayback | 01/13/04
2 In A Row...  cybershoplifter | 01/13/04
50 Cent maybe but definitely not Sheryl  ShadeTree | 01/13/04
Formats make no differnce  voska | 01/13/04
Good point! But add...  AbsolutelyNot | 01/13/04
They should be paid for both copies  cybershoplifter | 01/13/04
Exactly  tic swayback | 01/13/04
Sorry, But  Update victim | 01/13/04
copyright should be reduced  JWatson77 | 01/13/04
did not circumvent fair use....  cybershoplifter | 01/13/04
Take a leaf from the studios  Nigel Johnstone | 01/13/04
Let's hope Jack Valenti doesn't get the same idea!  AbsolutelyNot | 01/13/04
be carefull  JWatson77 | 01/13/04
Uhh.. did I miss something here?  d_jedi | 01/13/04
The consumer should have to pay double too!  Tammee | 01/13/04
Consumer choice  Sunny Jalolly | 01/13/04
thin profit margins??  ryusen | 01/13/04
Thats the point  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/13/04
My bleeding heart  DarthRidiculous | 01/13/04
Re: your bleeding heart  SelfGovern | 01/14/04
Boycott not working.  ShadeTree | 01/13/04
DRM  curio@... | 01/14/04
boycott  curio@... | 01/14/04
Good and Bad  boatelc | 01/14/04
Ahh: The Irony Of It All  dags_lax | 01/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement