On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 36 of 45:
Next »
« Previous
"well documented"
If the competition is open source, then the code is known to anyone who wants to use it.

Pretend that Linux, say, is coded without mistakes or vulnerabilities. We know that's not true, but say it is for the sake of argument.

Someone who wanted to produce malware to attack such a system could do so with the cooperation of the user. The observation has been made frequently that malware writers are not bothering to play the patch game. They have too easy a time getting users to infect their machines.

Remember the test for anti-spyware programs? What was it, 1,500 spyware related files installed voluntarily by users of a file-sharing program? And that spyware larded software was among the most popular of its kind.

Any operating system can be locked down. But any user with enough authority can overcome the protections.

I'm arguing that systems have to be protected despite the user. If you accept that point, then Windows has an advantage because its ecosystem is more capable than any other at delivering the software needed for defense. That's because of the number and experience of security companies.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 07/05/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Message has been deleted.  Squawkbox | 07/05/05
Whoohoo musta touched a nerve  Squawkbox | 07/06/05
With MS buying Claria,  bjbrock | 07/05/05
Or the criminal element in the company buying it...  HypnoToad | 07/06/05
This falls into the "Gee, ya think?" category (nt)  Letophoro | 07/05/05
Wow ... Brilliant Article!  rick752 | 07/05/05
It's not criminals-- it's Linux trolls!  neul | 07/05/05
???  Linux User 147560 | 07/05/05
You do realize that...  vferrara | 07/05/05
I didn't find that trolling  voska | 07/05/05
Righto  Boot_Agnostic | 07/05/05
I hope not!  NonZealot | 07/05/05
You must have some very extreme font  Linux User 147560 | 07/05/05
No extreme font needs at all  NonZealot | 07/05/05
The problem?  Linux User 147560 | 07/05/05
Okay  NonZealot | 07/06/05
RE: Okay  Linux User 147560 | 07/06/05
RE: ok  linuxoverwindows | 07/06/05
re: Linux User  NonZealot | 07/06/05
RE: re: Linux User  Linux User 147560 | 07/06/05
yeah...  linuxoverwindows | 07/06/05
Oh dear, *MORE* SuSE trouble?  whisperycat | 07/06/05
you can run windows based...  linuxoverwindows | 07/06/05
A Mike Cox you ain't ... (NT)  George Jay | 07/05/05
dam fonts...  linuxoverwindows | 07/06/05
Specialized malware  Anton Philidor | 07/05/05
And thats the point  Richard Flude | 07/05/05
Richard  Linux User 147560 | 07/05/05
Life's givens.  Anton Philidor | 07/05/05
Using your metaphor  Linux User 147560 | 07/05/05
Another of 'life's givens'  JusPassinThrough | 07/05/05
Managing change  Richard Flude | 07/05/05
Paid people are also very talented  osreinstall | 07/06/05
RE: Paid people are also very talented  Linux User 147560 | 07/06/05
Reality Check  osreinstall | 07/06/05
"well documented"  Anton Philidor | 07/05/05
Thing you fail to realize  Linux User 147560 | 07/05/05
And yet...  Richard Flude | 07/05/05
"HINT" at ????  realitycheck101 | 07/05/05
7,944 pieces of malware and growing.  michael_t | 07/05/05
That's right 'everyone' is vulnerable but  michael_t | 07/05/05
Mactard  Support Slug | 07/05/05
Always one in the crowd  JusPassinThrough | 07/05/05
Hey Einstein: explain to me why  michael_t | 07/05/05
Just answer me one simple question  NonZealot | 07/06/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here