On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 7:
« Previous
As long as that liscence sais
You do not own the music you purchase,as a patron,it will remain a thing of the past.

The idealists within copyright scenarios do not understand that a product conveyed via patronage cannot impart a 'lifetime arrangement via custodial relationship of seller and purchaser.

This kind of means that when you decide that a 'person exists of patron,you,that is YOU (of a liscencor) you exhibit the persons realistic expectation of that 'good.

Estabolishing that:
a:a given good is portayed as wholesome
when:
1.patron agrees that devices be known of a seller,and perpetuates relationship to seller for the confined exhistance of good to those devices by patron

2.agrees that seller has extenuating 'rights of exhibition of properties (in real terms)known on the patrons premises as asset to them within exhibition of good.

3.agrees that this perpetuality exists as long as the good remains as software.


Your in for a long planetary denial by this patron and user.

Since the U.S. constitution relates that person should be secure in their persons from unwarranted search and seizure.....

And..
Copyright law does not entenuate 'expulsion of this priveldge based on ownership of said 'property of good.

And..
DMCA..as well gives no provision of usury,or placation of this privelege based on 'usage,or person of use.

Then as far as all is concerned.These 'liscences are basically comical denial of a 'person.Namely that of the premises,property,and identity for those that use them.Agreeing on a business basis the casually apply themselves as a 'liability for having them 'as good.

These goods' cannot BE a liability,on the part of security of them.The can only BE AS ASSET to the person using them,and yes OWNING THEM,as a good,through patronage ,payment and usage.

As well it is not a necesity of a patron to divulge technology on their premises in order to disacociate piracy of a copyright,from performance of a good.In that order of persistance.

It may very well be that through 'sales,and tax documentations and the like that corresponding discussions will morph into 'intelectual property formulations in a quantitative mention.But the means of evaluation true ownership of such goods remains the association of the patron,outside of inclusion of business liscence,contract,or otherwise divergent perpetual scenarios of correspondance.


Real will be lucky if I have read this story.



-just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 01/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

bad experiences with Real's stuff  JosePinchero | 01/06/04
MP3  Nigel Johnstone | 01/07/04
MP3 is dying  jocknerd | 01/07/04
Don't think so  Nigel Johnstone | 01/07/04
Personally, no thanks Real  FilledOut | 01/07/04
RealRealReal BOOO!  angvil | 01/07/04
As long as that liscence sais  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/07/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here