On CBS MoneyWatch: How much sleep do you really need?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 26 of 32:
Next »
« Previous
Not Spyware
Since the second type does not send any information to the company it is not Spyware.
Posted by: ShadeTree   Posted on: 12/30/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Nice ...  worknman | 12/23/03
So what  master of illusion | 12/24/03
exactly  JWatson77 | 12/29/03
Whoopee  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/23/03
Agreed...  BitTwiddler | 12/24/03
Whatever  FilledOut | 12/23/03
IMO=  afterbrnr | 12/23/03
IMO=  FilledOut | 12/23/03
Yes! Good for Symantec!  George Mitchell | 12/23/03
That's Quite A Plan  Don Bradley | 12/23/03
Horsepuckies...  BitTwiddler | 12/24/03
Cite Please  Don Bradley | 12/24/03
Are you for real?  George Mitchell | 12/24/03
Yeah I'm for Real  Don Bradley | 12/24/03
what do you mean  JWatson77 | 12/29/03
Good For Symantec  wadeprater | 12/23/03
Why not Product Activation?  Riff Fox | 12/24/03
Ok, be enlightened...  BitTwiddler | 12/24/03
Not only that ....  worknman | 12/24/03
Re: Ok, be enlightened...  Riff Fox | 12/25/03
What you need to know.  ShadeTree | 12/30/03
NIC drivers do not break Activation.  ShadeTree | 12/30/03
Product Activation is unnecessary  George Mitchell | 12/24/03
There are TWO tyupes of product activation.  Update victim | 12/24/03
Re: There are TWO tyupes of product activation.  Riff Fox | 12/25/03
Not Spyware  ShadeTree | 12/30/03
So that's where...  BitTwiddler | 12/24/03
Clearly Not Symantec  jnonneman | 12/24/03
And I bet ....  ohshutup | 12/27/03
A Fine Verdict, But...  jnonneman | 12/24/03
THE SPAMMERS GET IT FINALLY  srjarmz | 12/29/03
symantec wins . . .  mark_wurster | 12/29/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement