On CHOW: Holiday side dishes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 33:
Next »
« Previous
The myth that MS is attacked because its more popular
Windows is attacked because it is weak and inherently secure. Ask yourself this. Fort Knox is secure, right? And 2 Fort Knox's are secure, right? And 100 Fort Knox's, they'd all be secure, yes? And 100,000 Fort Knox's they would all be equally secure, yes? So what is this stupid, Microsoft sponsored argument that Windows is attacked more because it's popular? IF Windows was secure, it wouldn't matter whether there were 10, 1000,100000000000 instances of it. They would all be equally secure. But Windows is inherently insecure, by design, and so it doesn't matter whether there are 10, 100, 100000000 instances of Windows, they are all equally insecure and THAT is why they get attacked.

While you're picking the bones out of that, have a lok at http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/05/index.html, the web server statistics. You will see that 70% of every web server on the WWW is running Open Source Apache. Just 21% of web servers on the www are running Microsoft's IS. And which web server gets 95% of all succesfull hack attacks? Microsft's of course! WHich kind of puts paid to the "it gets hit cos its more popular" argument. Microsoft IIS and Microsoft Windows get succesfully hacked and hit more by virus, worms and trojans not because they are so popular, but because Microsoft products ARE INHERENTLY INSECURE.
Posted by: whisperycat   Posted on: 05/05/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Here's a question ...  worknman | 05/04/05
Step up MS  Richard Flude | 05/04/05
Duh, reply to story is the other button  Richard Flude | 05/04/05
You're making an assumption...  gfeier | 05/04/05
Not just an assumption  Richard Flude | 05/04/05
That leaves 66 %...  gfeier | 05/05/05
Absolutely right  ebrke | 05/05/05
To easy to avoid detection  voska | 05/05/05
MS Windows is the problem, it's insecure and flawed!  matrixdomain | 05/04/05
I tell ya, I'm going BACK to my Mac for online banking...  BitTwiddler | 05/05/05
B of A  Bill4 | 05/05/05
Blame the OS  bobiroc | 05/05/05
The myth that MS is attacked because its more popular  whisperycat | 05/05/05
The myth that MS is attacked because its more popular  whisperycat | 05/05/05
The Big Picture  bobiroc | 05/05/05
Sorry but the MS marketing argument won't work  whisperycat | 05/06/05
No!  bobiroc | 05/06/05
Now if I was a scammer ...  George Mitchell | 05/05/05
Guys like you give Linux a bad name  Squawkbox | 05/05/05
Thanks for another unbiased post  I_am_hellion_z | 05/05/05
What we need to do!  chalkbd@... | 05/05/05
Not to worry  nucrash | 05/05/05
3.0 Mike Cox I am not.  nucrash | 05/05/05
Don't be so hard on yourself  Michael Kelly | 05/05/05
Not A Problem At Our Organization  itanalyst | 05/05/05
7.5 for the rookie  luke_sg | 05/05/05
If this ever becomes a problem with Linux ...  George Mitchell | 05/05/05
you wish because you don't know  matrixdomain | 05/05/05
MS is to blame b/c they have done nothing to fix the probs!  kbeartxzd | 05/05/05
Linux isn't exactly innocent  severian@... | 05/06/05
really?  matrixdomain | 05/06/05
you are a fraud  matrixdomain | 05/06/05
we are waiting .....  matrixdomain | 05/06/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here